Henry VII of England
Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and PovertyHenry VII of England was the Lancastrian victor in the Wars of the Roses and became king in 1485. His significance in the book lies not only in ending a prolonged contest over the crown, but in starting a Tudor process that concentrated political authority while helping create pressure for broader representation. Centralization could strengthen royal power, yet it also encouraged elites to seek a voice in how that power was used.
Identity and Accession
The Wars of the Roses were a long struggle between the Houses of Lancaster and York, both of which had contenders for the English crown. The Lancastrians prevailed, and their candidate, Henry Tudor, became Henry VII in 1485. The book presents his accession as the outcome of an intra-elite conflict over who would rule, rather than as the end of political conflict itself.
Centralizing the State
After taking the throne, Henry VII disarmed the aristocracy, effectively demilitarizing it and substantially expanding the power of the central state. This was the opening stage of a wider Tudor project. His son, Henry VIII, later advanced it through the work of Thomas Cromwell, who introduced a nascent bureaucracy in the 1530s, helping transform government from the king’s private household into enduring institutions. Henry VIII’s break with the Roman Catholic Church and the Dissolution of the Monasteries further removed an independent source of power and resources. The book therefore treats Henry VII’s actions as the beginning of a process continued by his successors, not as a completed institutional settlement.
Centralization and Political Pluralism
Centralized authority could enable a king and his associates to suppress other powerful groups, which helps explain opposition to the growth of the state. But it could also prompt barons and local elites to demand influence over the institutions whose power was becoming harder to resist. In England during the late fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, that pressure took the form of efforts to make Parliament a counterweight to the Crown and to exercise some control over the state’s operation. The Tudor project thus strengthened central institutions while indirectly contributing to pluralism—the other institutional pillar that the book identifies as important to inclusive political arrangements.
Historical Significance
Henry VII’s role is part of a longer redistribution of political power. The first elected Parliament had appeared in 1265, and, despite its elite membership, it represented interests beyond those closest to the king, including minor aristocrats connected with commerce and industry and, later, commercially active farmers. Parliament would become a principal base of resistance to monarchical expansion. In the book’s account, Henry VII’s centralization helped shape the conditions under which such resistance and demands for representation could develop. His significance is consequently structural: the consolidation of royal power also helped provoke the political claims that could limit it.